![]() |
|||||||||||||||
| HOME PAGE | CURRENT INVESTIGATION | ARTICLES | MOVIES | ARCHIVES | FAQ | ||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
| AUGEAN STABLES | PRIVACY POLICY | ABOUT US | SEND FEEDBACK / CONTACT US | ||||||||||||
People who followed Middle East news in 2000 cannot forget
the image of Muhamed al Durah, gunned down in a hail of Israeli bullets
at the very beginning of the Al Aqsa Intifada. The impact of this dramatic
footage on global culture is close to incalculable. Its prominence goes
far beyond any other image from this terrible conflict and its impact
goes far beyond any of its other images, one of “the most powerful images
of the past 50 years,” one of the shaping images of this young 21st
century. One extreme claims that it reveals Israeli malevolence and
wanton violence, deliberately targeting a defenseless child and killing
him in cold blood. “In killing this boy the Israelis killed every child
in the world” (Osama bin Laden). The other side claims that it was either
staged or a snuff film that reveals the ruthless and paranoid nature
of PA media culture… the first blood libel of the 21st century. Even-handedness
– Who knows who did it? It’s a tragedy – doesn’t work here. If
we hope to learn anything from this terrible event, it will come from
examination. We put the evidence before you and the five possible scenarios
with arguments for and against. Judge for yourself.
|
Come to the site November 21
See the evidence,
make up your own mind. | ||||||||||||||
| LEGAL ISSUES | TO JOIN | FORUM | TO REGISTER | SITE MAP | |||||||||||